
this weekend was spectacular. it began with sushi, angie stone at b.b king's, and drinks in hell’s kitchen and ended with an andretti-style fung wah bus ride with annelise at 3 am, one of my two new friends.
take notice of the french flag temporarily tattooed on my back in the photo. i watched the world cup final in boston city hall plaza with 5,000 boston metro area residents alongside presh, laurel (new friend #2), and annelise. french fans were outnumbered. even my illustrious company rooted for italy.
i began rooting for france in the quarter finals. feeling no specific allegiance to a country at this point, i decided to root for zidane this being his swan song, his dream if you will.
i rooted for france for another reason. i see the make-up of france’s very multiracial team as a symbolic and hopeful answer to football’s very racist politics. star player
zidane is algerian,
henry is from the french west indies,
vierira is from senegal,
ribery is married to a north african muslim, just to name a few. so imagine my disappointment when zidane head-butted an italian footballer during the 110th minute of play.
i liken back to the langston hughes poem “
a dream deferred” in this post because i guarantee that zidane’s head butt was inspired by a racial comment. am i positive?
no. am i nearly sure?
hell yes.
what disappoints me most is that many bloggers and editorial columnist (
la times,
new york times,
bbc) are playing the fool pretending as though zidane’s temper combusted with little prompting. writer after writer has spoken of a zidane frustrated at the tie score in double overtime, fatigued from intensive play, or pressured from having his countrymen and the world watching him. surely, all of the above are indeed true but aren’t we overlooking the pink elephant? i find this non-mention insulting and a strategic move to push under the rug racial tensions that exist throughout the world cup and in football, generally. look no further than thierry henry’s anti-racism campaign called
stand up, speak up, a call to arms to end racist politics in football (created back in 2004 when spanish fans made monkey sounds in the stands) or the paris race riots or the european obsession with lovers of christ and the public rejection of immigrant muslims.
george vecsey of the new york times, a man whose opinion i respect, called zidane’s action “thuggish.” i don’t necessarily disagree but i can’t help but grimace at the characterization.
much in the way black katrina victims became “refugees,” zidane is a thug for retaliating. i'm frustrated by the puzzled faces - it seems crystal clear to me.
maybe it just sags like a heavy load.
or does it explode?